公共场所戒烟的英语作文
公共场所禁烟 Should Smoking In Public Places Be Banned?We can see such signs as “No Smoking” in some public places, which is a kind of measure taken to ban smoking in public places. However, concerning about this measures, different people hold divergent opinions. The smokers protest against that it is a kind of action to deprive of their free right, while the non-smokers are in favor of banning smoking in public places. 在一些公共场所我们可以看到像“禁止吸烟”这一类的标志,这都是在公共场所禁烟的方法。然而,对于这种措施,不同的人有不同的想法。吸烟者认为这是剥夺他们自由权的行为,而不吸烟的人则是支持在公共场所禁止吸烟。 In my opinion, I am inclined to support the latter one—smoking should be banned in public places. There are reasons accounting for my point. For one thing, people will be harmed by the second-hand smoking if someone smokes in public places, especially the infants and children. For another, banning smoking in public places is also beneficial to the smokers. If they are banned to smoke in public places, they will restrain themselves from smoking and smoke less. In the meantime, it is a contribution to reduce the air pollution. 在我看来,我更倾向于支持后者——在公共场所应该禁止吸烟。我有我的原因。一方面,如果有人在公共场所吸烟的话,人们就会受到二手烟的伤害,特别是婴儿和儿童。另一方面,在公共场所禁止吸烟对于吸烟者也是有好处的。如果在公共场所禁止吸烟,他们就会被限制吸烟,少抽烟。同时,对于减少空气污染也是有贡献的。 Therefore, I advocate that smoking in public places should be banned so that we can breathe the fresh air and suffer less from the second-hand smoking. Let’s work together to create and sustain out green and fresh environment. 因此,我主张在公共场所禁止吸烟,这样我们才可以呼吸到新鲜的空气,少吸二手烟。让我们一起共创造、维持绿色清新的环境。
I don't think that smoking should be allowed in public places. all people know that smoking is bad for us, but they don't care about that. for public places, there must be many people there, such as the gardens and stations. when these smokers smoke there, so many non-somkers will get "hurt" at the same time, their health are under the smoke harm. if there are some kids, even babies, the result will be worse. as usual, people will stay away from those smokers, they are not welcomed. A new law about forbidding smoking in public places is now on its way in China, which also tells that smoking should not be allowed in public places.
We all agree that smoking is dangerous, it can cause cancer, heart disease and respiratory not only harm the smoker himself, but also harms people who is nearby. By breathing other people's smoke (second-hand smoke), also cause lung smoking in public places can helps push smokers to quit, hopefully realize how serious their problem is and severely it has been affecting their lives..............................
No Smoking in All Public Places Some businesses now say that no one can smoke cigarettes in any of their offices. Some governments have banned smoking in all public places. This is a good idea though it takes away some of our freedom. As we know, smoking is harmful not only to our health but also to the environment. Smoking can lead to many diseases, such as lung cancer. Smoking affects non-smokers more than it does smokers. Ratio of passive smokers getting ill is higher than that of smokers. So, many nonsmokers are against smoking. In public places, the harm of smoking is greater. This is connected with another effect of smoking. That is, smoking pollutes environment by giving much poisonous vapour off into the air. Therefore, that the government ban smoking is very necessary and important to us. It is a measure to protect our health and environment. So many people, especially nonsmokers are Ior tile policy. Some people say that it takes away some of our freedom. I think it is a one-sided view. If one wants to smoke, he may smoke in private, not in the public places. In fact, smokers still have the freedom of smoking. But, I think, smokers had better give up smoking, not only in private places, but also in the public places, everywhere. It will be beneficial to all of us.
公共场所吸烟的英语作文
禁止在公共场所吸烟(No Smoking in All Public Places) Some businesses now say that ao one call smoke cigarettes in any of their offices. Some governments have banned smoking in all public places. This is a good idea though it takes away some of our freedom. As we know, smoking is harmful not only to our health but also to the environment. Smoking can lead to many diseases, such as lung cancer. Smoking affects non smokers more than it does smokers. Ratio of passive smokers getting ill is higher than that of smokers. So, many nonsmokers are against smoking. In public places, the harm of smoking is greater. This is connected with another effect of smoking. That is, smoking pollutes environment by giving much poisonous vapour off into the air. Therefore, that the government ban smoking is very necessary and important to us. It is a measure to protect our health and environment. So many people, especially nonsmokers are for the policy. Some people say that it takes away some of our freedom. I think it is a one-sided view. If one wants to smoke, he may smoke in private, not in the public places. In fact, smokers still have the freedom of smoking. But, I think, smokers had better give up smoking, not only in private places, but also in the public places, everywhere. It will be beneficial to ail of us.
分太少不够脑细胞磨损的
禁止在公共场所吸烟(No Smoking in All Public Places) Some businesses now say that ao one call smoke cigarettes in any of their offices. Some governments have banned smoking in all public places. This is a good idea though it takes away some of our freedom. As we know, smoking is harmful not only to our health but also to the environment. Smoking can lead to many diseases, such as lung cancer. Smoking affects non smokers more than it does smokers. Ratio of passive smokers getting ill is higher than that of smokers. So, many nonsmokers are against smoking. In public places, the harm of smoking is greater. This is connected with another effect of smoking. That is, smoking pollutes environment by giving much poisonous vapour off into the air. Therefore, that the government ban smoking is very necessary and important to us. It is a measure to protect our health and environment. So many people, especially nonsmokers are for the policy. Some people say that it takes away some of our freedom. I think it is a one-sided view. If one wants to smoke, he may smoke in private, not in the public places. In fact, smokers still have the freedom of smoking. But, I think, smokers had better give up smoking, not only in private places, but also in the public places, everywhere. It will be beneficial to ail of us. [参考译文] 禁止在公共场所吸烟 现在,有些单位宣称没有人可以在他们的办公室里吸烟。有些国家已禁止在公共场所吸烟,这种做法很好,尽管它剥夺了我们一些自由。正如我们所知道的,吸烟不仅对健康不利而且对环境也不利。吸烟会导致多种疾病,例如:肺癌。烟气对不吸烟者的影响有甚于对吸烟者本人的影响。被动吸烟比吸烟人患病率要高。所以很多不吸烟的人反对吸烟。 在公共场合吸烟危害更大,这是吸烟产生的另外一种影响。那就是,吸烟所产生的大量有害气体会污染环境。因此,政府禁烟对我们来说是非常必要的和重要的。这是保护人类健康和环境的一个办法。所以有许多人,尤其是不吸烟的都赞同这一政策。 有些人说这会剥夺我们的一些自由。我认为这样的观点是片面的。如果某人想抽烟,可以在私人场合抽烟而不是在公共场合。实际上,烟民仍然有吸烟的自由。不过,我认为不仅仅是私下里,而且,在公共场合,在任何地方烟民最好放弃抽烟。这会有益于每个人。
Ban smoking in Public places?Smoking bans can be seen in public places in many class had a heated discussion on banning smoking in public fall into the one hand,some students think that it is bad for health and it is also has a strong influence on other some students think that people should give up coin has two of them think that people can smoke in public 's none of anyone if people don't smoke,it is bad for oporating of it can make a my opinion,I think people shouldn't smoke,because it is bad for their health.
关于公共场所吸烟的英语作文
No SmokingSome businesses now say that no one can smoke cigarettes in any of their offices. Some governments have banned smoking in all public places. This is a good idea though it takes away some of our we know, smoking is harmful not only to our health but also to the environment. Smoking can lead to many diseases, such as lung cancer. Smoking affects non-smokers more than it does smokers. Ratio of passive smokers getting ill is higher than that of smokers. So, many nonsmokers are against public places, the harm of smoking is greater. This is connected with another effect of smoking. That is, smoking pollutes environment by giving much poisonous vapour off into the , that the government ban smoking is very necessary and important to us. It is a measure to protect our health and environment. So many people, especially nonsmokers are Ior tile people say that it takes away some of our freedom. I think it is a one-sided view. If one wants to smoke, he may smoke in private, not in the public places. In fact, smokers still have the freedom of , I think, smokers had better give up smoking, not only in private places, but also in the public places, everywhere. It will be beneficial to all of us.⊙该文章转自[英语作文网 ] 原文链接:
禁止在公共场所吸烟(No Smoking in All Public Places) Some businesses now say that ao one call smoke cigarettes in any of their offices. Some governments have banned smoking in all public places. This is a good idea though it takes away some of our freedom. As we know, smoking is harmful not only to our health but also to the environment. Smoking can lead to many diseases, such as lung cancer. Smoking affects non smokers more than it does smokers. Ratio of passive smokers getting ill is higher than that of smokers. So, many nonsmokers are against smoking. In public places, the harm of smoking is greater. This is connected with another effect of smoking. That is, smoking pollutes environment by giving much poisonous vapour off into the air. Therefore, that the government ban smoking is very necessary and important to us. It is a measure to protect our health and environment. So many people, especially nonsmokers are for the policy. Some people say that it takes away some of our freedom. I think it is a one-sided view. If one wants to smoke, he may smoke in private, not in the public places. In fact, smokers still have the freedom of smoking. But, I think, smokers had better give up smoking, not only in private places, but also in the public places, everywhere. It will be beneficial to ail of us.[参考译文]禁止在公共场所吸烟 现在,有些单位宣称没有人可以在他们的办公室里吸烟。有些国家已禁止在公共场所吸烟,这种做法很好,尽管它剥夺了我们一些自由。正如我们所知道的,吸烟不仅对 环境 环境不利而且对 环境 环境也不利。吸烟会导致多种疾病,例如:肺癌。烟气对不吸烟者的影响有甚于对吸烟者本人的影响。被动吸烟比吸烟人患病率要高。所以很多不吸烟的人反对吸烟。 在公共场合吸烟危害更大,这是吸烟产生的另外一种影响。那就是,吸烟所产生的大量有害气体会污染 环境 环境。因此,政府禁烟对我们来说是非常必要的和重要的。这是保护人类 环境 环境和 环境 环境的一个办法。所以有许多人,尤其是不吸烟的都赞同这一政策。 有些人说这会剥夺我们的一些自由。我认为这样的观点是片面的。如果某人想抽烟,可以在私人场合抽烟而不是在公共场合。实际上,烟民仍然有吸烟的自由。不过,我认为不仅仅是私下里,而且,在公共场合,在任何地方烟民最好放弃抽烟。这会有益于每个人。Not allowing smoking in public places and office building is a very good rule. I believe this for several reasons .Not only will banning smoking improve people’s health, it will also increase worker productivity and reduce conflicts. we all know smoking is not healthy. Unfortunately, when smokers are able to smoke in public buildings, they can make other people sick . They may work with people who are allergic to smoking, for examples. In that case , the non-smokers have no choice unless they want to quit their jobs. They can only get sicker , which is unfair .Of course , banning smoking in public buildings and offices will please non-smokers. It will also improve the smokers’ health. They will have fewer opportunities to smoke, so they will smoke fewer cigarettes. Banning smoking in office buildings can also increase worker productivity. Smokers won’t interrupt their work all the time to smoke. There will also be fewer worker absences. When smokers cut down the number of cigarettes, they will get fewer smoking related illnesses. Finally, it is a good idea to ban smoking in public places and office buildings because a ban can reduce conflicts. Non-smokers tend to get annoyed and jealous because smokers have an excuse to take frequent breaks .The most significant conflict, however, is over whether smokers have a right to smoke in public . As we have already seen, non-smokers feel they are not always given a choice. If smoking in public is allowed , they will be forced to breathe harmful air. This may violate their rights, and non-smokers are angry with smokers because of it. It seems clear that banning smoking n public places and office buildings is a good idea. It will reduce conflict and increase productivity. It will also benefit health of smokers and non-smokers alike. I believe that just about anything that improve our health is a good ideaTobacco smoke is killing thousands of people every year and injuring hundreds of thousands more every day like children. Federal officials released a massive report that is sparking renewed efforts to ban smoking in public places. Secondhand smoke has been classified as known carcinogen, this classification is only shared by ten other pollutants.(These pollutants include benzene, asbestos and smoke inhaled directly from cigarettes. Govenor Mario Cuomo has asked the Legislature to outlaw smoking on school grounds and antismoking advocates said they would target airlines and fast food chains for similar bans. The risk of developing lung cancer due to tobacco smoke is 1 in 1,000 for nonsmokers and 2 in 1,000 for nonsmoking spouses of smokers. However, the risk for smokers is 70 in every 1,000. Passive smoking causes between 150,000 and 300,000 cases of bronchitis, pneumoia and similar infections in children less than 18 months old and worsens the condition of between 200,000 and 1 million asthmatic children. It is pointless to allow people to smoke in one part of a restaurant and not to allow it in another when eventuallly the nonsmoking section breathes in the smoke. In conclusion, second hand smoke is a human carcinogen that kills about 3,000 . nonsmokers because of lung cancer annually. Cigarette smoke is responsible ffor 150,000 to 300,000 cases of bronchitis and pneumonia and other lower respiratory infections in children up to 18 months of age. Tobacco smoke is also known to cause the build-up of fluid in the middle ear causing various infections. As one can see it is not recommended for people to smoke in public due to the effects it has on smokersa s as well as nonsmokers.
No Smoking As we know, smoking is harmful not only to our health but also to the environment. Smoking can lead to many diseases, such as lung cancer. Smoking affects non-smokers more than it does smokers. Ratio of passive smokers getting ill is higher than that of smokers. So, many nonsmokers are against smoking. Some people say that it takes away some of our freedom. I think it is a one-sided view. If one wants to smoke, he may smoke in private, not in the public places. In fact, smokers still have the freedom of smoking. So, I think, smokers had better give up smoking, not only in private places, but also in the public places, everywhere. It will be beneficial to all of us.
Smoking is harmfulWhen you are in public places, you will see many smokers, most of whom are young people and even middle school students. It is said that in China smokers cover about 45 do so many people enjoy smoking?Some think that it is a pleasure,some believe that it can refresh themselves. In fact,smoking is a bad habit. It does great harm to our health,not only to the smoker himself,but also to others. For smokers,it is a great waste of money,and it causes many kinds of diseases. Besides, many fires are caused by careless and more people are beginning to realize the harm of smoking and decide to give it up. If you are not a moker,don't start.
公共场所禁止吸烟的英文
Smoking in public places
No Smoking in Public Areas.公共场所禁止吸烟。We should refuse smoking.我们应反对吸烟。如果对你有帮助的话希望采纳哦~ Good luck!
在公共场合禁止吸烟 No smoking in public places我们应该反对吸烟 we should say no to smoking
No smoking in should be against smoking. ~~~~回答简明扼要,欢迎追问。(*^__^*) ~~~~
公共场所的英文
In public in the public in public places in the public place都可以
公共场所Public place
public place.
公共场所的英文:public place
public 读法 英 ['pʌblɪk] 美 ['pʌblɪk]
1、adj. 公众的;政府的;公用的;公立的
2、n.公众;社会;公共场所
短语:
1、public bidding 公开投标
2、public library 公共图书馆;公立图书馆
3、public finance 财政学
4、public space 公共空间;银行营业厅
5、public order 公共秩序;社会治安
一、public的近义词:community
community 读法 英 [kəˈmju:nətɪ] 美 [kəˈmjunətɪ]
n. 社区;[生态] 群落;共同体;团体
短语:
1、scientific community 科学界
2、european community n. 欧洲共同市场
3、research community 研究社群
4、global community 全球社区;地球村
5、community center 社区活动中心
二、community的词义辨析:
community, society这两个词的共同意思是“社会”,在作有共同职业、爱好的“团体”“社团”解时,两词可互换使用。两者区别在于:
1、society意为“社会”“社会阶层”,是普通用语,语义范围比community广泛,泛指全人类的社会,普遍的社会各阶层,侧重人文概念。
2、community指由同住一地区或同一国的人所构成的“社区”“社会”,侧重地理概念。